15.03.2016 22:28, David Steele:
> On 3/4/16 2:56 PM, Vitaly Burovoy wrote:
>
>> On 3/4/16, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>>
>>> I think that you should update documentation. At least description of
>>> epoch on this page:
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/functions-datetime.html
>> Thank you very much for pointing where it is located (I saw only
>> "to_timestamp(TEXT, TEXT)").
>> I'll think how to update it.
> Vitaly, have you decided how to update this yet?
>
>>> 3. (nitpicking) I don't sure about "4STAMPS" suffix. "4" is nice
>>> abbreviation, but it seems slightly confusing to me.
>> It doesn't matter for me what it is called, it is short enough and
>> reflects a type on which it is applied.
>> What would the best name be for it?
> Anastasia, any suggestions for a better name, or just leave it as is?
>
> I'm not in favor of the "4", either. I think I would prefer
> JULIAN_MAXYEAR_STAMP.
>
This point is related to another patch
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/540/.
And added to this patch just for compatibility.
If Tom wouldn't change the name of the macros there, I don't see any
reasons why should we do it in this patch.
--
Anastasia Lubennikova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
