On 2016/03/10 2:16, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On 2016/03/09 10:11, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> The attached revision addresses above and one of Horiguchi-san's comments
>>> in his email yesterday.
>>
>> I fixed one more issue in 0002 per Horiguchi-san's comment. Sorry about
>> so many versions.
>
> I've committed 0001 with heavy revisions. Just because we don't need
> an SQL-visible function to clear the command progress doesn't mean we
> don't need to clear it at all; rather, it has to happen automatically.
> I also did a bunch of identifier renaming, added datid to the view
> output, adjusted the comments, and so on. Please rebase the remainder
> of the series. Thanks.
Great, thanks a lot for the review and committing in much better shape!
I rebased remainder patches (attached).
0001 is a small patch to fix issues reported by Tomas and Vinayak. 0002
and 0003 are WIP patches to implement progress reporting for vacuum.
Thanks,
Amit
