On 03/08/2016 02:16 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>>> Instead of "durable" I think that "persistent" makes more sense.
>>
>> I find durable a lot more descriptive. persistent could refer to
>> retrying the rename or something.
>
> Yeah, I like durable, too.
There is also precedent, DURABLE as in aciD
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
