On 2016/03/07 19:11, Amit Langote wrote:
> we should re-introduce[1] a fixed-size char st_progress_message[] field.
Sorry, that [1] does not refer to anything, just a leftover from my draft.I thought I had a link handy for an email
wheresome sort of
justification was given as to why st_progress_message field was removed
from the patch. I couldn't find it.
Thanks,
Amit