Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Date
Msg-id 56DD5568.5070902@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016/03/07 19:11, Amit Langote wrote:
> we should re-introduce[1] a fixed-size char st_progress_message[] field.

Sorry, that [1] does not refer to anything, just a leftover from my draft.I thought I had a link handy for an email
wheresome sort of
 
justification was given as to why st_progress_message field was removed
from the patch.  I couldn't find it.

Thanks,
Amit





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Greeting for coming back, and where is PostgreSQL going