Re: Declarative partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh berkus
Subject Re: Declarative partitioning
Date
Msg-id 56C28C4C.5090409@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Declarative partitioning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Declarative partitioning
List pgsql-hackers
On 02/15/2016 04:28 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
> Also, you won't see any optimizer and executor changes. Queries will still
> use the same plans as existing inheritance-based partitioned tables,
> although as I mentioned, constraint exclusion won't yet kick in. That will
> be fixed very shortly.

We're not going to use CE for the new partitioning long-term, are we? 
This is just the first version, right?

-- 
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: A bit of PG archeology uncovers an interesting Linux/Unix factoid
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning