Re: Windows performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: Windows performance
Date
Msg-id 56BE3106.4040404@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows performance  ("Sterpu Victor" <victor@caido.ro>)
Responses Re: Windows performance  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 2/12/2016 8:09 AM, Sterpu Victor wrote:
> The query is very big but I pasted it at the end of the mail with the
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE.

I ran that explain through Depesz's 'explain' analyzer.
http://explain.depesz.com/s/c7ts

there's a lot(!) of small steps in that query.   I'm going to hazard a
guess that the issue is related to semaphore overhead or something like
that.

certainly, ti would be good to benchmark both OS's on the same version
of postgres, comparing 9.1 to 9.5 isn't fair.

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: PosgreSQL Security Architecture
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows performance