On 02/05/2016 10:16 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> An in-core auditing solution would provide us with proper grammar
> support, ability to directly mark objects for auditing in the catalog,
> allow us to much more easily maintain auditing capability over time as
> a small incremental bit of work for each new feature (with proper
> in-core infrastructure for it) and generally be a far better technical
> solution. Leveraging the GRANT system is quite cute, and does work, but
> it's certainly non-intuitive and is only because we've got no better
> way, due to it being implemented as an extension.
I think one additional item needed would be the ability for the audit
logs to be sent to a different location than the standard logs.
> To make true progress towards that, however, we need to get past
> the thinking that auditing doesn't need to be in-core or that it should
> be a second-class citizen feature or that we don't need it in PG.
+1
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
