On 2016-02-05 05:06, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
>>> [ num_nulls_v6.patch ]
>
>> I started looking through this. It seems generally okay, but I'm not
>> very pleased with the function name "num_notnulls". I think it would
>> be better as "num_nonnulls", as I see Oleksandr suggested already.
>
> Not hearing any complaints, I pushed it with that change and some other
> cosmetic adjustments.
Thanks Tom and Pavel and everyone who provided feedback.
.m