Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Date
Msg-id 56B3FC6E.8080006@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/29/15 10:38 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:10:55AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> should be noted, recorded somewhere so this introduce possible
>>>>> compatibility
>>>>> issue - due default processing .psqlrc.
>>>>
>>>> That's written in the commit log, so I guess that's fine.
>>>
>>> ook
>>
>> Bruce uses the commit log to prepare the release notes, so I guess
>> he'll make mention of this.
> 
> Yes, I will certainly see it.

I generally use the master branch psql for normal work, and this change
has caused massive breakage for me.  It's straightforward to fix, but in
some cases the breakage is silent, for example if you do
something=$(psql -c ...) and the .psqlrc processing causes additional
output.  I'm not sure what to make of it yet, but I want to mention it,
because I fear there will be heartache.





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: "using previous checkpoint record at" maybe not the greatest idea?
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: pgcommitfest reply having corrupted subject line