On 02/02/2016 02:05 AM, Curtis Ruck wrote:
> [snip]
>
> P.S., do you know what sucks, having a highly performant PostGIS
> database that works great, and being told to move to Oracle or SQL
> Server (because they have auditing). Even though they charge extra
> for Geospatial support (seriously?) or when they don't even have
> geospatial support (10 years ago). My customer would prefer to
> re-engineer software designed around PostgreSQL and pay the overpriced
> licenses, than not have auditing. I agree that their cost analysis is
> probably way off, even 10 years later, my only solution would be to
> move to Oracle, SQL Server, a NoSQL solution, or pay EnterpriseDB for
> their 2 year old version that doesn't have all the cool/modern jsonb
> support.
Huh? PPAS 9.5.0.5 is already out there since at least last week; Before
that PPAS 9.4.5.y or so was there ...
(Not affiliated with EDB, but precision is important)
I agree that auditing is a big selling point and frequently used... But
it's got to be done "the Postgres way", and that takes time (and usually
provides superior results).
Just my .02€
/ J.L.
