Re: Generalizing SortSupport for text to work with char(n), bytea, and alternative opclasses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Karlsson
Subject Re: Generalizing SortSupport for text to work with char(n), bytea, and alternative opclasses
Date
Msg-id 56AED838.8090303@proxel.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Generalizing SortSupport for text to work with char(n), bytea, and alternative opclasses  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: Generalizing SortSupport for text to work with char(n), bytea, and alternative opclasses
Re: Generalizing SortSupport for text to work with char(n), bytea, and alternative opclasses
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I have reviewed this now and I think this is a useful addition even 
though these indexes are less common. Consistent behavior is worth a lot 
in my mind and this patch is reasonably small.

The patch no longer applies due to 1) oid collisions and 2) a trivial 
conflict. When I fixed those two the test suite passed.

I tested this patch by building indexes with all the typess and got nice 
measurable speedups.

Logically I think the patch makes sense and the code seems to be 
correct, but I have some comments on it.

- You use two names a lot "string" vs "varstr". What is the difference 
between those? Is there any reason for not using varstr consistently?

- You have a lot of renaming as has been mentioned previously in this 
thread. I do not care strongly for it either way, but it did make it 
harder to spot what the patch changed. If it was my own project I would 
have considered splitting the patch into two parts, one renaming 
everything and another adding the new feature, but the PostgreSQL seem 
to often prefer having one commit per feature. Do as you wish here.

- I think the comment about NUL bytes in varstr_abbrev_convert makes it 
seem like the handling is much more complicated than it actually is. I 
did not understand it after a couple of readings and had to read the 
code understand what it was talking about.

Nice work, I like your sorting patches.

Andreas



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: 高增琦
Date:
Subject: Re: How can I build OSSP UUID support on Windows to avoid duplicate UUIDs?
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics