Re: yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4
Date
Msg-id 56A138DD.1030502@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4  (Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Re: yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Re: yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 1/21/2016 11:46 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 10:09 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>> >the yum packages for 9.5 apparently changed the path of the socket
>> >from  /tmp to /var/run/postgresql
> I think we use both now. If not, that must be a packaging bug. On my
> boxes, I can see that the unix_socket_directory points to both.
>


indeed, 9.5 is putting it in both places, but 9.5's libpq is looking for
it in /var/run/pgsql ...  the problem is the older versions are only
putting it in /tmp, so the newer libpq doesn't work.

does unix_socket_directory allow dual locations in 9.1+  ?  I guess I
should just try that...



--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: Re: yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4
Next
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4