Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
Date
Msg-id 569DE3C9.1050408@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 01/19/2016 08:03 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
...
>>> Tomas, I am planning to have a look at that, because it seems to be
>>> important. In case it becomes lost on my radar, do you mind if I add
>>> it to the 2016-03 CF?
>>
>>
>> Well, what else can I do? I have to admit I'm quite surprised this is still
>> rotting here, considering it addresses a rather serious data loss /
>> corruption issue on pretty common setup.
>
> Well, I think you did what you could. And we need to be sure now that
> it gets in and that this patch gets a serious lookup. So for now my
> guess is that not loosing track of it would be a good first move. I
> have added it here to attract more attention:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/484/

Ah, thanks. I haven't realized it's not added into 2016-1 (I'd swear I 
added it into the CF app).


--
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: BUG #13685: Archiving while idle every archive_timeout with wal_level hot_standby
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)