On 18/01/2016 19:36, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 01/18/2016 10:15 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>
>>> * Participants who disrupt the collaborative space, or participate in a
>>> pattern of behaviour which could be considered harassment will not be
>>> tolerated.
>>
>> Personally, I was comfortable with the rest of it, but this one
>> made me squirm a little. Could we spin that to say that those
>> behaviors will not be tolerated, versus not tolerating the people?
>> Maybe:
>>
>> * Disruption of the collaborative space or any pattern of
>> behaviour which could be considered harassment will not be
>> tolerated.
>
> No argument from me. I think they both service the same gist.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> JD
>
>
>
I would also vote in favour of not tolerating the behaviour. I guess it would
be less open to critics than saying a participant is not tolerated...
--
Stéphane Schildknecht
Contact régional PostgreSQL pour l'Europe francophone
Loxodata - Conseil, expertise et formations
06.17.11.37.42
