Re: Why not represent "never vacuumed" accurately wrt pg_class.relpages? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Why not represent "never vacuumed" accurately wrt pg_class.relpages?
Date
Msg-id 5697.1544556530@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why not represent "never vacuumed" accurately wrtpg_class.relpages?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> To me the whole logic around this largely seems to be cargo culting
> things forward.

Well, feel free to propose some other behavior --- but I'm more
worried about how badly it will fail when wrong than whether the
plans are better when right.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Why not represent "never vacuumed" accurately wrtpg_class.relpages?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Sketch of a fix for that truncation data corruption issue