Re: object description for FDW user mappings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: object description for FDW user mappings
Date
Msg-id 5695.1425601830@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: object description for FDW user mappings  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: object description for FDW user mappings
List pgsql-hackers
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> On 06-03-2015 AM 01:32, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1 for the concept, but to be nitpicky, "in" doesn't seem like the right
>> word here.  "on server" would read better to me; or perhaps "at server".

> One more option may be "for server" (reading the doc for CREATE USER MAPPING)

Hm, but then you'd have "user mapping for foo for server bar", which
doesn't read so nicely either.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Rethinking pg_dump's function sorting code
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: object description for FDW user mappings