Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Date
Msg-id 56946330.1010600@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.  (Vinayak Pokale <vinpokale@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016/01/12 10:30, Amit Langote wrote:
> I'm slightly concerned that the latest patch doesn't incorporate any
> revisions to the original pgstat interface per Robert's comments in [1].

I meant to say "originally proposed pgstat interface on this thread".

Thanks,
Amit





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_conversion seems rather strangely defined