Re: invisible dependencies on a table? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: invisible dependencies on a table?
Date
Msg-id 5694.1387060934@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: invisible dependencies on a table?  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com> writes:
> Alright, just do my head does not explode, I am going to say the
> pg_describe_object() query is from a different run where you used table
> names foonew and fooold instead of foo1 and foo2?

Argh, sorry about that!  I decided old/new would be more useful names
in the middle of composing the example, and forgot to go back and fix
the creation commands in my text.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Unexpected update behaviour
Next
From: Wolfgang Keller
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters)