Re: pg_controldata/pg_resetxlog "Latest checkpoint's NextXID" format - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: pg_controldata/pg_resetxlog "Latest checkpoint's NextXID" format
Date
Msg-id 56832292.2070403@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_controldata/pg_resetxlog "Latest checkpoint's NextXID" format  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_controldata/pg_resetxlog "Latest checkpoint's NextXID" format  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/29/2015 07:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah.  Use of the same x/y notation with two different bases seems like
> a recipe for confusion.  It's probably too late to do anything about
> this for 9.5, but I'd be +1 for adopting Jose's suggestion or some
> other formatting tweak in HEAD.

I made the "%u/%u" -> "%u:%u" change in the controldata patch I just
posted, but I suppose I should commit that separately. Any complaints
about that?

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain
Next
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS