On 12/28/2015 11:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>> I retract my earlier suggestion of doing HEAD different from
>> REL9_5_STABLE, at least for the moment. My patch for pg_controldata
>> related functions is going to impact all this anyway, so we might as
>> well not fuss about it now.
>
> Seems reasonable.
>
>> Any objections to the attached?
>
> Looks OK in a quick once-over.
Pushed to HEAD and 9.5
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
