Re: bytea vs. pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bernd Helmle
Subject Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 565C89DC4525DF15B55922B1@teje
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bytea vs. pg_dump  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
--On Samstag, Mai 30, 2009 00:47:16 +0300 Hannu Krosing 
<hannu@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote:

> And we can also escape the need to uncompress TOAST'ed fields - just
> markup the compression as another \c at the beginning of data.

Hmm i thought about that, but that seems only to make sense if there is an 
easy way to "bypass" compressing the data on restore. Also, it seems to me 
that compression/decompression isn't a "real" bottleneck, but that needs to 
be confirmed.

--  Thanks
                   Bernd


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type
Next
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump