Re: [PROPOSAL] Inputs on forcing VACUUM VERBOSE to write timestamp - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Inputs on forcing VACUUM VERBOSE to write timestamp
Date
Msg-id 565341EA.2080809@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PROPOSAL] Inputs on forcing VACUUM VERBOSE to write timestamp  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/3/15 1:50 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>     Unconvinced - sounds like you're just re-inventing log_line_prefix.
>
>
> Many times I've wanted a client_log_line_prefix.  If someone wants to
> invent that, I'd second it.

It would be pretty awkward to have to turn that on and off to run a 
manual vacuum, unless there was a LOGTIME option added to vacuum as well.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: documentation for wal_retrieve_retry_interval
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Truncating/vacuuming relations on full tablespaces