Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Maksim Likharev
Subject Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
Date
Msg-id 56510AAEF435D240958D1CE8C6B1770A016D2D3B@mailc03.aurigin.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user  ("Jay O'Connor" <joconnor@cybermesa.com>)
Responses Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user  (Avi Schwartz <avi@CFFtechnologies.com>)
List pgsql-general
My I ask on what operations PG better than MSSQL?

cause out of my observations only spatial data types,
could influence a choice between MSSQL and PG.

Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Avi Schwartz [mailto:avi@CFFtechnologies.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:12 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user


 From Microsoft SQL Server 7.  We looked briefly at MySQL but realized
that the features we need will not be out until at least version 5
while PostgreSQL has them now.

Avi

On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 21:34 America/Chicago, Maksim Likharev
wrote:

> Could you clarify are you moving from MySQL or Microsoft SQL 7.0?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avi Schwartz
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:21 PM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
>
>
> We are currently in the middle of a process of moving from SQL Server
7
> to PostgreSQL.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Avi Schwartz
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL gets $19.5 MM