On 11/04/2015 02:53 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> This implies that a statement used takes a long time. It may not. The
> lock is held at the transaction level not the statement level, which is
> why a transaction level timeout is actually more useful than a statement
> level timeout.
>
> What I'm most interested in, in the use case which I described and which
> David built a system for, is getting that lock released from the lower
> priority process to let the higher priority process run. I couldn't care
> less about statement level anything.
>
Ahh, o.k. Yes, I could see the benefit to that.
JD
> Thanks!
>
> Stephen
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
New rule for social situations: "If you think to yourself not even
JD would say this..." Stop and shut your mouth. It's going to be bad.
