On 2015/11/04 20:04, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 09:48 AM, Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was able to reproduce it here.
>> Because I can't understand the current code at once, please give me some
>> time
>> to solve the problem.
>
> I also started looking at this last week, and came up with a patch
> that I think fixes it, but I got distracted before completing it and
> replying here. So here's what I came up with...
>
The solution seems to generate 2 transactions for 1 insertion.
The insertion seems to be rejected when ByteaAsLongVarBinary=1.
Are they intentional?l
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
