On 10/29/2015 03:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> We don't need hasty patches. What we need is a re-think of the division
> of labor between pg_dump and pg_dumpall. Up to now, pg_dump has only been
> charged with dumping/restoring the data "inside" an individual database,
> not with handling any database-level properties. Those are the
> responsibility of pg_dumpall.
>
Hello
A wiki page with some proposals to improve pg_dump can be found here:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Pg_dump_improvements
It was created sometime ago after a discussion on pgsql-hackers. Refs on
the wikipage.
regards
--
Rafael Martinez Guerrero
Center for Information Technology
University of Oslo, Norway
PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/