Re: Domain check constraint not honored? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rob Sargent
Subject Re: Domain check constraint not honored?
Date
Msg-id 5632A8BE.7040604@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Domain check constraint not honored?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Domain check constraint not honored?  (Dane Foster <studdugie@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 10/29/2015 05:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Eric Schwarzenbach <subscriber@blackbrook.org> writes:
... (Also FWIW, the latest version of 
this regexp is now '^([0-9]+.)*[0-9]+$')
Um, that's not gonna do what you want at all.  Outside brackets, a dot
is a wildcard.  (Regex syntax is a mess :-(.)
		regards, tom lane


arg. back to level two of regexpness for me :(  I read it as ^[0-9.]+

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Domain check constraint not honored?
Next
From: David Blomstrom
Date:
Subject: Hierarchical Query Question (PHP)