Re: PostgreSQL support on Redhat Advance Server 2.1 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PostgreSQL support on Redhat Advance Server 2.1
Date
Msg-id 5629.1143581633@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL support on Redhat Advance Server 2.1  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
List pgsql-general
Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 13:14, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> Tom has mentioned in the past that he's been backpatching stuff to 7.3
>> as part of his job, so I would assume that RH will support any 7.3
>> version.

> But only for supported OSes.  I'm pretty sure 2.1 is past due on that
> count.

The real problem is that PG 7.1 is effectively unsupportable: there are
too many fundamentally unfixable bugs in it, such as transaction ID
wraparound, type-unsafeness in I/O routines, yadda yadda.  These things
can't be dealt with without introducing significant incompatibilities,
which means you may as well just update to some newer version instead.

Unfortunately Red Hat's backwards-compatibility policy forbids dropping
new major PG releases into old RHEL branches, so AS2.1 is stuck with
7.1.  The best I can do in the way of support is to wave a big cluestick
at anyone foolish enough to try to use Postgres on that platform: get a
newer version, or expect to regret it.  I'm not bothering to back-patch
bug fixes, in view of the huge unfixable bugs.

RHEL3 (with PG 7.3) is at least something you could plausibly use
Postgres on without expecting to lose data, so 7.3 is still getting
fixes for major bugs.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL support on Redhat Advance Server 2.1
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: best practice in upgrading db structure