On 10/05/2015 04:01 PM, Amir Rohan wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 11:57 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> So either the API needs to be updated to return the actual URL, and the
>> consumers (which at this point I believe are just the main website) need
>> to be updated to actually use that URL, or the consumer also needs to be
>> updated with the same "cleaning" rules, or the URL parsing in the
>> archives code need to also deal with all those cases.
>>
>> I think either the first, or a combination of first and third, of those
>> are the way to go. The second one (doing the same changes in the pgweb
>> code) seems to just put us in a position where we'll make the same
>> mistake again next time we try to fix these rules.
>>
>
> With these patches <...>
Bump. Magnus, is there something more I can do to get this on live
on postgresql.org?
