On 2015-10-09 10:31 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> I was about to report this as a bug until Marko Tiikkaja pointed out on
> IRC that now was being treated as an alias for relname.
>
> I'm not sure if this is required by the spec, but can we at least emit a
> WARNING if not reject this case outright? I think it'd be OK to leave
> the AS syntax alone... presumably it's a lot harder to fumble that. But
> I'm not wed to that.
I'd be happy to turn on a GUC disabling this misfeature. It's only ever
brought pain and unhappiness to me and my family.
.m
