Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2
Date
Msg-id 560f1eb3-5b43-eade-1c87-15c7d83130a8@postgresfriends.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/02/2020 03:38, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:21:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
>>> way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes.
>>> If we've actually got a broad consensus on it, sure, but I don't think
>>> 4 votes is a broad consensus.
>>
>> Fair point.  I'm still abstaining, but maybe this should be proposed
>> on pgsql-general to try to get more opinions?
> 
> Indeed, still I am not sure what kind of number is enough to define a
> large consensus.  Vik, could you start a new thread on -general?

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3d8e809b-fc26-87c5-55ac-616a98d2b0be%40postgresfriends.org
-- 
Vik Fearing



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Assumptions about the number of parallel workers
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Is custom MemoryContext prohibited?