On 2015-09-28 10:22 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 09/27/2015 12:39 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> Also, I think "WAL Buffer auto-tuning" should be cut. It doesn't
>> warrant inclusion here. There are one or two other items that should
>> be pruned too, but less obviously so.
>
> I disagree here; I think that anything which eliminates a need for
> manual tuning is a significant feature. Expecially if you're looking at
> the chart and trying to remember "hey, do I need to tune checkpoint
> segments on this version?"
I totally agree with Josh. Especially for newer or less-savvy users, this means
it just became easier to use Postgres in a performant way, and ease of use gets
customers. -- Darren Duncan
