Re: 9.3.9 and pg_multixact corruption - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: 9.3.9 and pg_multixact corruption
Date
Msg-id 56098835.8050401@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to 9.3.9 and pg_multixact corruption  (Bernd Helmle <bernd@oopsware.de>)
Responses Re: 9.3.9 and pg_multixact corruption  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/28/2015 08:10 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> -1 on that idea.  I really don't think that we should categorically
> decide we don't support higher optimization levels.  If the compiler
> has a bug, then the compiler manufacturer should fix it, and it's not
> our fault.  If the compiler doesn't have a bug and our stuff is
> blowing up, then we have a bug and should fix it.  I suppose there
> could be some grey area but hopefully not too much.

Or it's PILBChAK. I know Sun-CC used to warn that -O3 was unsuitable for
most programs because it could change behavior.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY planning
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.3.9 and pg_multixact corruption