Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs
Date
Msg-id 5601AD88.8070103@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/16/15 5:52 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> IMHO the default is the best one at the current time.
> See recovery_min_apply_delay.

The applications of recovery_min_apply_delay are likely to be varied and
specific, so there might not be a general answer to this, but wouldn't
you want hot_standby_feedback on with it?  Because the longer you wait
on the standby, the more likely it is that the primary will clean stuff
away.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape
Next
From: Erik Rijkers
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation