Re: [Bug] Add the missing RTE_GRAPH_TABLE case to transformLockingClause() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [Bug] Add the missing RTE_GRAPH_TABLE case to transformLockingClause()
Date
Msg-id 55f40114-0b00-4c6d-919d-c58641133d2b@eisentraut.org
Whole thread
In response to Re: [Bug] Add the missing RTE_GRAPH_TABLE case to transformLockingClause()  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10.06.26 14:49, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> Attached is v2-0001, rebased on master and addressing
>> the comments you added in case we plan on parking the feature
>> work for once v20 opens.
> Thanks. I revised it a bit. Reworded the commit message to describe
> user facing behaviour instead of the internals, which are quite
> obvious from the code changes. Other cases in transformLockingClause()
> don't mention XXX, they just have ereport(). Removed that comment.
> Also massaged comments in the test - we usually don't describe the
> expected behaviour or error when it is obvious from the output.
> Attached revised patch.

Committed.

I also modified the comment that said "ignore JOIN, SPECIAL, ..." to 
just say "ignore all other RTE kinds", because keeping that kind of list 
up to date is silly.  (RTE_SPECIAL hasn't existed in a long time.)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Parallel Apply
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix null pointer dereference in PG19