Re: honour TEMP_CONFIG in pg_upgrade tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: honour TEMP_CONFIG in pg_upgrade tests
Date
Msg-id 55FAE28F.1090906@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: honour TEMP_CONFIG in pg_upgrade tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 09/17/2015 09:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> I propose to have the pg_upgrade test honour TEMP_CONFIG as pg_regress
>> (or its Makefile) does, by applying the patch below. There might be
>> opther places this should also be done, but this would be a start.
> No objection to the concept, but I wonder if the -f test should
> instead be a -r test (in the original place too, I guess).
>
>             

In the original place permissions are in effect tested in pg_regress.c.

I'll go ahead with -r.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: index-only scans with partial indexes
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Microvacuum for gist.