Re: Materialized View or table? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Materialized View or table?
Date
Msg-id 55F7C92B.8070204@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Materialized View or table?  (Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 9/15/15 2:14 AM, Johann Spies wrote:
> What are the pro's and con's of large materialized views vs. tables in a
> case like this?

AFAIK a matview is essentially the same as a table under the covers, so
I don't believe there's any reason not to use one. At some point we'll
have incremental refresh of some sort, which might help in your case.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: pgpass (in)flexibility
Next
From: Sylvain MARECHAL
Date:
Subject: BDR truncate and replication sets