Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Date
Msg-id 55E8BD85.1050709@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-09-03 20:26, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>>> I don't think that necessarily means it must continue to be in contrib.
>>> Quite the contrary, I think it is a tool critical enough that it should
>>> not be relegated to be a second-class citizen as it is now (let's face
>>> it, being in contrib *is* second-class citizenship).
>>
>> I have resisted that principle for years and will continue to do so.
>> It is entirely reasonable for some DBAs to want certain functionality
>> (debugging tools, crypto) to not be installed on their machines.
>> Folding everything into core is not a good policy, IMHO.
>
> I don't understand.  I'm just proposing that the source code for the
> extension to live in src/extensions/, and have the shared library
> installed by toplevel make install; I'm not suggesting that the
> extension is installed automatically.  For that, you still need a
> superuser to run CREATE EXTENSION.
>

+! for this

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: strange test in psql:startup.c
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Core dump with nested CREATE TEMP TABLE