Re: 9.4 broken on alpha - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: 9.4 broken on alpha
Date
Msg-id 55E6097C.8080203@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.4 broken on alpha  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/01/2015 01:18 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I think we've probably beat this to death.  Nobody here believes that
>> it's sane to try to support Alpha without access to hardware, and no
>> offer of hardware has been forthcoming.  If one were to materialize,
>> we could usefully have a debate about whether it's worth doing ...
>
> I agree. I can't believe how seriously Alpha support has been debated
> here. I think that the Linux implementation is simply very limited, or
> broken.

It isn't even made any more. Alpha is dead except for obscure hobbyists. 
We aren't Debian, we should be much more stringent on the platforms we 
support.

Sincerely,

JD


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.4 broken on alpha
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Dependency between bgw_notify_pid and bgw_flags