On 08/07/2015 10:12 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
> <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:
>> On 08/06/2015 09:01 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> Folks:
>>>
>>> If you search:
>>>
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/search/?u=%2Fdocs%2F9.5%2F&q=tablesample
>>>
>>> You turn up a number of doc pages detailing the new TABLESAMPLE
>>> functionality. However, if you actually click on the links:
>>>
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/tablesample-method-functions.html
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/catalog-pg-tablesample-method.html
>>>
>>> ... they are 404. Doc build errors?
>>
>> no this looks like an artifact of the alpha2 release - it seems like the
>> docs loaded to the website for 9.5 are currently out-of-sync with the
>> webspider feeding our search engine(in this particular case the reason
>> is the TABLESAMPLE rewrite from tom). I assume dave has that on his radar...
>
> As far as I'm aware, it's fully automated, but I'm not at all familiar
> with the code and am probably not going to be able to investigate
> until next week due to other commitments. Not sure when Magnus is
> back, but he can probably help with some pointers at least.
well I think the point is the timing of the docs loading process during
the release vs the timing of the job that does the spidering.
Since I was not aware how far you had progressed with the release
(especially when you had done the docs loading) it made not a lot of
sense investigating further on the search/spider side.
Stefan
