Re: Proposal: backend "niceness" / session_priority - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Karlsson
Subject Re: Proposal: backend "niceness" / session_priority
Date
Msg-id 55BAA653.5050301@proxel.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: backend "niceness" / session_priority  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 07/31/2015 12:18 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>> This has been proposed before, and rejected before, and I'm not seeing
>> anything particularly new here.  Without a credible mechanism for
>> throttling I/O, "nice" alone does not seem very promising.
>
> Some OSes respect nice when it comes to IO scheduling, so it might still
> be useful.

Wouldn't the bgwriter remove a lot of the usefulness?

Andreas



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reload SSL certificates on SIGHUP
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Using quicksort and a merge step to significantly improve on tuplesort's single run "external sort"