On 7/22/15 4:45 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> But it seemed to me that this could be rather confusing. I thought it
> would be better to be explicit about whether the protections are
> enabled in all cases. That way, (1) if you see the message saying
> they are enabled, they are enabled; (2) if you see the message saying
> they are disabled, they are disabled; and (3) if you see neither
> message, your version does not have those protections.
But this is not documented, AFAICT, so I don't think anyone is going to
be able to follow that logic. I don't see anything in the release notes
saying, look for this message to see how this applies to you, or whatever.
