Re: DB access speeds, App(linux)<->PG(linux) vs App(linux) <->MSSql(Windows) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andy Colson
Subject Re: DB access speeds, App(linux)<->PG(linux) vs App(linux) <->MSSql(Windows)
Date
Msg-id 558ABA1D.7020803@squeakycode.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to DB access speeds, App(linux)<->PG(linux) vs App(linux) <->MSSql(Windows)  ("Gauthier, Dave" <dave.gauthier@intel.com>)
Responses Re: DB access speeds, App(linux)<->PG(linux) vs App(linux) <->MSSql(Windows)  ("Gauthier, Dave" <dave.gauthier@intel.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 6/24/2015 8:44 AM, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
> Hi:  I'm trying to get a 10,000 ft understanding of the difference in DB
> access speeds for two different scenarios...
>
> Scenario 1:     Apps are on linux.  PG DB is on linux (different server
> than apps)
>
> Scenario 2:     Apps are on linux.  MSSql DB is on Windows (obviously a
> different server)
>
> The apps are typically perl scripts using Perl DBI.
>
> I'm thinking that since perl has a DBD driver for PG, that would be
> faster than going through ODBC to get to the MsSQL DB, but I'm not sure
> about that.
>
> Any insights/guesses ?
>
> Thanks in Advance.
>

I think it'll depend on your usage.

If you fire off one really big analytic sql that chews on a huge table
and does stats and counts, then odbc vs native will make no difference.

If you fire off lots and lots of small querys that hit an index and
return very fast, then native is the way to go.

-Andy



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: DB access speeds, App(linux)<->PG(linux) vs App(linux) <->MSSql(Windows)
Next
From: John Bleichert
Date:
Subject: Re: mirroring a server and/or hot standby