Re: BUG #13440: unaccent does not remove all diacritics - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: BUG #13440: unaccent does not remove all diacritics
Date
Msg-id 55896247.5020909@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #13440: unaccent does not remove all diacritics  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 6/18/15 4:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> I think it's perfectly sensible to update the rules in master (even if
>> that has consequences for pg_upgraded databases). I'm just doubtful
>> about the merits of backpatching changes like this.
>
> Well, that's certainly a fair position.  How do others feel?

I wouldn't change it in the backbranches either.  It's easy to change
the mapping locally if there is a need.

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Hans Ginzel
Date:
Subject: CREATE IF NOT EXISTS RLE/USER/INDEX
Next
From: Марк Коренберг
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #13462: Impossible to use COPY FORMAT BINARY in chunks through libpq