Re: multixacts woes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: multixacts woes
Date
Msg-id 555111C2.7070207@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: multixacts woes  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 05/11/2015 10:24 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:

> In terms of adding a new GUC in 9.5: can't we take a stab at auto-tuning
> this instead of adding a new GUC?  We already have a bunch of freezing
> GUCs which fewer than 1% of our user base has any idea how to set.

That is a documentation problem not a user problem. Although I agree 
that yet another GUC for an obscure "feature" that should be internally 
intelligent is likely the wrong direction.

JD

-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Disabling trust/ident authentication configure option
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Multi-xacts and our process problem