On 7/19/22 10:20, Tom Lane wrote:
> Everything else either explicitly rejects more-than-one-D arrays
> or does something that is compatible with thinking of them as
> arrays-of-arrays.
I think I am responsible for at least some of those, and I agree that
thinking of MD arrays as arrays-of-arrays is preferable even though they
are not actually that. Long ago[1] Peter E asked me to fix that as I
recall but it was one of those round tuits that I never found.
> So I withdraw my original position. These functions should just
> shuffle or select in the array's first dimension, preserving
> subarrays. Or else be lazy and reject more-than-one-D arrays;
> but it's probably not that hard to handle them.
+1
Joe
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/Pine.LNX.4.44.0306281418020.2178-100000%40peter.localdomain#a064d6dd8593993d799db453a3ee04d1
--
Joe Conway
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
