Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Proposed WAL changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposed WAL changes
Date
Msg-id 5546.983892818@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Proposed WAL changes  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
>> Remove archdir from pg_control; it ought to be a GUC
>> parameter, not a special case (not that it's implemented yet anyway).

> Is archdir really a GUC parameter ?

Why shouldn't it be?  I see nothing wrong with changing it on-the-fly.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: There is error at the examples in PL/pgSQL