Re: regression in PG 15.1 - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: regression in PG 15.1
Date
Msg-id 554068.1669648550@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: regression in PG 15.1  (Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>)
Responses Re: regression in PG 15.1
List pgsql-admin
Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com> writes:
>> On Nov 28, 2022, at 7:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Why do you say this is a regression?  From what I know of the partition
>> pruning logic (admittedly not a whole lot), I don't think we'd have
>> ever pruned on the basis of such a constraint.

> Because performance of the query tanked.

Compared to what?  If you said something like "it worked as I expected
in Postgres x.y", that would be something to go on.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Scott Ribe
Date:
Subject: Re: regression in PG 15.1
Next
From: Scott Ribe
Date:
Subject: Re: regression in PG 15.1