Re: schema or database - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: schema or database
Date
Msg-id 552B28DE.2050007@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: schema or database  (Ian Barwick <ian@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: schema or database
List pgsql-general
On 4/12/2015 7:20 PM, Ian Barwick wrote:
> If as you say access to the database is via a single application database
> user, it will probably make more sense to use multiple schemas rather than
> multiple databases. Keeping everything in one database will simplify
> administration (e.g. making backups - ypu'll just need to dump the one database
> rather than looping through a variable number) and will make life easier if you
> ever need to do some kind of query involving multiple customers.
> There will also be less overhead when adding a new schema vs adding
> a new database.

and less overhead in connections, as one client connection can serve
multiple customers

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ian Barwick
Date:
Subject: Re: schema or database
Next
From: Michael Cheung
Date:
Subject: Re: schema or database