Re: SIGSEGV on cvs tip/7.3.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SIGSEGV on cvs tip/7.3.2
Date
Msg-id 5526.1054147130@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SIGSEGV on cvs tip/7.3.2  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
>> There's been some past speculation about putting in a function call
>> nesting depth limit, but I haven't been able to think of any reasonable
>> way to estimate a safe limit.

> GUC variable?  Hmm...but that would mean that a normal user could still just
> crash the machine...?

Yeah, which makes it a bit pointless :-(.  Too bad there's not any
portable way to get some behavior other than SIGSEGV for stack overflow.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Sequence usage patch
Next
From: "Yurgis Baykshtis"
Date:
Subject: Mismatched parentheses when creating a rule with multiple action queries